However, Spinoza’s argument is focussed less on a desire to feel good about destiny and more on a desire to omit grief from the domain of regret. The negative aspect of regret is unnecessary and even irrational, they said, because we ought to embrace the undulations of life.Īny such attempt to make rational thinking override naturally-occurring reactions seems a little too idealistic in our modern world of nuanced psychology. Some of the bolder thinking on regret, by Spinoza and Nietzsche, followed the idea of amor fati or love of fate. However, as has been intuited by some philosophers and evidenced by modern neuroscientific research (see for example ‘Neural Foundations for Regret-Based Decision Making’, Revue d’Economie Politique, 118:1, p.63, Ambrosino et al, 2008), the most powerful of the post-decision emotions appears to be regret. The way we process any of these emotions will be due to our personal history, and can change our future behaviour. There are subtly yet distinctly different possibilities within this set: dissatisfaction itself, disappointment, regret, grief, and potentially, remorse. The feelings stimulated by recognising a decision to have been bad can be intense, difficult to shake off, and complexly woven. But perhaps the most nuanced and philosophically rewarding state to examine is dissatisfaction. On the other hand, being merely nonchalant about the outcome could reflect any of several mentalities, from perceiving the decision as insignificant, to a healthy detachment, to an unhealthy detachment. I wonder if being happy after a decision is the least interesting of these states? This attitude seems almost transactional: Was the objective achieved? Tick. Alternatively, they could be dissatisfied or they could be indifferent. But what happens afterwards? And how do our choices influence our future decision-making?Īfter a decision has been made and acted upon, the person who made it may be satisfied with the intention, the process, and the outcome. That is to say, ethics is generally concerned with the build-up to a decision point. While physicists and metaphysicians explore the possibility that the multiverse grows larger at every decision, it is the ethicist’s lot to consider the paths chosen. SUBSCRIBE NOW Articles On Regret David Charles argues that we should not regret our decisions, but should take responsibility for our decision-making processes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |